The long road to team success

Rumour abounds that certain Olympic sports are going to get their funding cut.

Every match lost.  Will it be handball?  Low medal tally.  Will it be swimming?  No one made a final.  What about the sprinters?  Successful rowers are interviewed and say if a sport doesn’t achieve then it can’t expect to keep the funding.

GB handball pushed aside by mighty Angola

I would like to put in a mini pitch to keep the support for the Olympic team sports that we performed ‘poorly’ in – handball, water polo, volleyball and basketball.    They are all incredibly complex sports that you cannot learn in four years.  For a team to become Olympic champions in one of these sports you will need a couple of squad members with well over a decade of top international experience and the rest of the team need to have learnt the sport from childhood.  You don’t get that with 4 years funding, we’re going to have to invest in these sports from the top to the bottom for decades.  We need to recognise now that it will take a lot of money because it would be an absolute waste of money to refund only for another four years and then cut it.

On the other hand you could put a bit of money into scientific somatotype spotting and pluck out some physiological freaks who could make potential world class rowers.  Stick them in a boat for 4 years and get them to practice pulling and you’ve got yourself an Olympic champion.  But let’s not pull the funding on the team sports just because they didn’t ‘succeed’ this time round.  They really had an impossible task just to win one match.

Will there be a legacy for GB water polo and their dressing gowns?

Rowing, sitting on horses and sailing are very elitist sports.  The team sports are so much more accessible and with a fraction of the money squirted in at grassroots level you could get yourself a hoard of wonderful community and school based handball and volleyball clubs.  Obviously, even if we succeed it wouldn’t have much effect on the medal table.  A generation of investment in water polo might give us one bronze medal every 12 years, if we’re lucky, compared to multiple ways to swim, ride, run, row and sail to Olympic glory.  But, believe it or not, it’s not all about the medal table.

What sports would you cut, or re-fund?  And why?


2 thoughts on “The long road to team success

  1. I would re-fund everything and more! There’s so much our new generations can learn from sports of all kinds…Perhaps more than they learn in an entire year of academic study (I’ll put that out there!), Not that academic study is bad, but my personal experience is that I’ve now discovered that some of it is pointless.

    By encouraging youngsters from all backgrounds to engage and love sport, to take something up and enjoy it, we are giving them a lifetime of health and social benefits, of community benefits and a sense of pride in their nation when their national team performs. We are giving youngsters something to aspire to – something they can see the tangible benefit of hard effort and practice.

    On holiday in the South East it’s so noticeable that there are fewer obese/overweight people. Those with more wealth generally have better access to health opportunities.

    Greater investment in all grassroot sports would help address the challenge of health equality in this nation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s